首页> 外文OA文献 >Herbivory reduces plant interactions with above- and belowground antagonists and mutualists.
【2h】

Herbivory reduces plant interactions with above- and belowground antagonists and mutualists.

机译:草食减少了植物与地上和地下拮抗剂和互惠生之间的相互作用。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Herbivores affect plants through direct effects, such as tissue damage, and through indirect effects that alter species interactions. Interactions may be positive or negative, so indirect effects have the potential to enhance or lessen the net impacts of herbivores. Despite the ubiquity of these interactions, the indirect pathways are considerably less understood than the direct effects of herbivores, and multiple indirect pathways are rarely studied simultaneously. We placed herbivore effects in a comprehensive community context by studying how herbivory influences plant interactions with antagonists and mutualists both aboveground and belowground. We manipulated early-season aboveground herbivore damage to Cucumis sativus (cucumber, Cucurbitaceae) and measured interactions with subsequent aboveground herbivores, root-feeding herbivores, pollinators, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). We quantified plant growth and reproduction and used an enhanced pollination treatment to determine if plants were pollen limited. Increased herbivory reduced interactions with both antagonists and mutualists. Plants with high levels of early herbivory were significantly less likely to suffer leaf damage later in the summer and tended to be less attacked by root herbivores. Herbivory also reduced pollinator visitation, likely due to fewer and smaller flowers, and reduced AMF colonization. The net effect of herbivory on plant growth and reproduction was strongly negative, but lower fruit and seed production were not due to reduced pollinator visits, because reproduction was not pollen limited. Although herbivores influenced interactions between plants and other organisms, these effects appear to be weaker than the direct negative effects of early-season tissue loss. © 2012 by the Ecological Society of America.
机译:草食动物通过直接作用(例如组织破坏)和通过改变物种相互作用的间接作用来影响植物。相互作用可能是正面的也可能是负面的,因此间接作用可能会增强或减少草食动物的净影响。尽管这些相互作用无处不在,但与草食动物的直接作用相比,对间接途径的了解要少得多,很少同时研究多种间接途径。通过研究食草动物如何影响植物与地面和地下的拮抗剂和互惠生之间的相互作用,我们将食草动物的影响置于全面的社区环境中。我们操纵了季节早期地上食草动物对黄瓜(黄瓜,葫芦科)的破坏,并测量了与随后的地上食草动物,食根的食草动物,传粉媒介和丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)的相互作用。我们量化植物的生长和繁殖,并使用增强的授粉处理来确定植物是否受花粉限制。草食动物的增多减少了与拮抗剂和互惠主义者的互动。早期草食动物含量高的植物在夏季晚些时候遭受叶片损害的可能性显着降低,并且受到根草食动物的攻击也较少。草食也减少了传粉媒介的访问,这可能是由于花朵越来越少所致,并且减少了AMF定植。食草对植物生长和繁殖的净影响是强烈的负面影响,但水果和种子产量的降低并不是由于减少了授粉者的访问,因为繁殖不受花粉的限制。尽管食草动物影响了植物与其他生物之间的相互作用,但这些作用似乎比早期组织损失的直接负面作用要弱。 ©2012,美国生态学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号